Can auditors be independent? – Experimental evidence


Koch, Christopher ; Weber, Martin ; Wüstemann, Jens


[img]
Preview
PDF
SSRN_ID1013051_code376713.pdf - Published

Download (275kB)

URL: https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/1778
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-17788
Document Type: Working paper
Year of publication: 2007
The title of a journal, publication series: Working papers
Volume: 146
Place of publication: Mannheim
Publication language: English
Institution: Business School > Sonstige - Fakultät für Betriebswirtschaftslehre
MADOC publication series: Lehrstuhl für ABWL, Finanzwirtschaft, insb. Bankbetriebslehre (Weber) > Working Papers
Subject: 330 Economics
Classification: JEL: M49 K22 G38 G34 C90 ,
Subject headings (SWD): Rechenschaft , USA / Sarbanes-Oxley Act , Audit Committee , Jahresabschlussprüfung , Unabhängigkeit
Keywords (English): Accountability , Audit Committee , Auditor Independence , Client Retention Incentives , Experience , Professional Skepticism
Abstract: In the U.S., the Sarbanes-Oxley Act made the audit committee responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the auditor. We examine whether this institutional change resolves the alleged problem of an unconscious favoring of the management (Bazerman et al. 1997, 2002, 2006). In our experimental design, we make use of the particular features of the German institutional setting as it enables us to manipulate the client of the auditor in a realistic and clear-cut way. First, we find that auditors demonstrate professional scepticism in the evaluation of evidence while they issue unbiased audit opinions. Second, we confirm that perceiving financial incentives to be high may bias the audit opinion. Making the auditor accountable to a supervisory board proved helpful in reducing this risk. Third, we show that auditors who perceive the psychological incentives to be high tend to favor the judgment of the management. This effect disappears for experienced auditors.
Additional information: Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.

Available versions of this item




+ Citation Example and Export

Koch, Christopher ; Weber, Martin ; Wüstemann, Jens (2007) Can auditors be independent? – Experimental evidence. Open Access Working papers Mannheim 146 [Working paper]
[img]
Preview


+ Search Authors in

+ Download Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item