Re-examining the middle means typical and the left and top means first heuristics using eye-tracking methodology


Höhne, Jan Karem ; Lenzner, Timo ; Neuert, Cornelia ; Yan, Ting



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz028
URL: https://academic.oup.com/jssam/advance-article-abs...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337759112...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2021
The title of a journal, publication series: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology : JSSAM
Volume: 9
Issue number: 1
Page range: 25-50
Place of publication: Oxford
Publishing house: Oxford Univ. Press
ISSN: 2325-0984 , 2325-0992
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS)
School of Social Sciences > Methoden d. empirischen Sozialforschung insbes. Internet Panel Survey-Forschung (Blom 2017-)
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > SFB 884
Subject: 300 Social sciences, sociology, anthropology
Abstract: Web surveys are a common self-administered mode of data collection using written language to convey information. This language is usually accompanied by visual design elements, such as numbers, symbols, and graphics. As shown by previous research, such elements of survey questions can affect response behavior because respondents sometimes use interpretive heuristics, such as the “middle means typical” and the “left and top means first” heuristics when answering survey questions. In this study, we adopted the designs and survey questions of two experiments reported in Tourangeau, Couper, and Conrad (2004). One experiment varied the position of nonsubstantive response options in relation to other substantive response options and the second experiment varied the order of the response options. We implemented both experiments in an eye-tracking study. By recording respondents’ eye movements, we are able to observe how they read question stems and response options and we are able to draw conclusions about the survey response process the questions initiate. This enables us to investigate the mechanisms underlying the two interpretive heuristics and to test the assumptions of Tourangeau et al. (2004) about the ways in which interpretive heuristics influence survey responding. The eye-tracking data reveal mixed results for the two interpretive heuristics. For the middle means typical heuristic, it remains somewhat unclear whether respondents seize on the conceptual or visual midpoint of a response scale when answering survey questions. For the left and top means first heuristic, we found that violations of the heuristic increase response effort in terms of eye fixations. These results are discussed in the context of the findings of the original studies.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item