"Narrative rationality" in user-generated political debate

Jakob, Julia

Document Type: Conference presentation
Year of publication: 2021
Conference title: ICA 2021 - 71th Annual International Communication Association Conference, Preconference: Comparative Perspectives on Negativity, Incivility, and Toxic Talk
Location of the conference venue: Online
Date of the conference: 27.05.2021
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Humanities > Medien I (Wessler)
Subject: 070 News media, journalism, publishing
Abstract: Deliberative theory traditionally considers the exchange of rational arguments to be at the heart of public debate. More inclusive theoretical concepts of deliberation, however, have started to also acknowledge personal storytelling based on individual experiences, values and emotions as support for publicly voiced opinions. The present study argues that rational argumentation and personal storytelling are no opposites in public deliberation, and that the point of a personal narrative in user-generated discussions is usually a rational justification. It provides an inductive classification of the forms of "narrative rationality" that occur in selected online news user comments from the websites of nine mainstream news media outlets from Australia, the United States, Germany and Switzerland.

Metadata export


+ Search Authors in

BASE: Jakob, Julia

Google Scholar: Jakob, Julia

ORCID: Jakob, Julia ORCID: 0000-0003-2340-5193

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information

You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail

Actions (login required)

Show item Show item