Are candidates rational when it comes to negative campaigning? Empirical evidence from three German candidate surveys


Maier, Jürgen ; Stier, Sebastian ; Oschatz, Corinna


[img] PDF
maier-et-al-2022-are-candidates-rational-when-it-comes-to-negative-campaigning-empirical-evidence-from-three-german.pdf - Published

Download (21MB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688221085239
URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/135406882...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/360224554...
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-679431
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2023
The title of a journal, publication series: Party Politics
Volume: 29
Issue number: 4
Page range: 766-779
Place of publication: London [u.a.]
Publishing house: Sage Publ.
ISSN: 1354-0688 , 1460-3683
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Social Sciences > Computational Social Science (Stier 2023-)
Pre-existing license: Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Subject: 320 Political science
Keywords (English): negative campaigning , rational choice , candidate survey , Germany
Abstract: This article tests the assumption that candidates’ attack behavior is a result of their rational consideration of potential benefits and likely risks. Based on candidate surveys from three German state elections, we demonstrate that (i) attacks are an important strategy; (ii) on balance, candidates regard attacking opponents as a costly instead of a beneficial strategy; (iii) the differential between benefits and costs is positively associated with attack behavior; nevertheless, most candidates attack at least sometimes even when costs exceed benefits; (iv) candidate characteristics and the electoral context are rarely reflected in benefit-cost calculations; and (v) the theoretically assumed mediating role of the benefit-cost differential on attack behavior applies only to some explanatory factors. While the findings provide some evidence for rational choice explanations of negative campaigning, they also challenge some central assumptions. As such, they demonstrate the need for more comprehensive theoretical explanations and measurements of negative campaigning.




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Download Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item