|
Complementary and Alternative Medicine: The Challenges of Ethical Justification. A philosophical analysis and evaluation of ethical reasons for the offer, use and promotion of complementary and alternative medicine
Mertz, Marcel
|
URL:
|
http://www.springerlink.com/content/456113276612t2...
|
|
Document Type:
|
Article
|
|
Year of publication:
|
2007
|
|
The title of a journal, publication series:
|
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy
|
|
Volume:
|
10
|
|
Issue number:
|
3
|
|
Page range:
|
329-345
|
|
Place of publication:
|
Dordrecht
|
|
Publishing house:
|
Springer
|
|
ISSN:
|
1386-7423 , 1572-8633
|
|
Publication language:
|
English
|
|
Institution:
|
School of Humanities > Philosophie II (Gesang 2009-)
|
|
Subject:
|
100 Philosophy
610 Medicine and health
|
|
Keywords (English):
|
alternative health care, applied ethics, CAM, complementary and alternative medicine, ethical justification of complementary and alternative medicine, medical ethics
|
|
Abstract:
|
With the prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) increasing in western societies, questions of the ethical justification of these alternative health care approaches and practices have to be addressed. In order to evaluate philosophical reasoning on this subject, it is of paramount importance to identify and analyse possible arguments for the ethical justification of CAM considering contemporary biomedical ethics as well as more fundamental philosophical aspects. Moreover, it is vital to provide adequate analytical instruments for this task, such as separating ‘CAM as belief system’, and ‘CAM as practice’, Findings show that beneficence and non-maleficence are central issues for an ethical justification of CAM as practice, while freedom of thought and religion are central to CAM as belief system. Many justification strategies have limitations and qualifications that have to be taken into account. Singularly descriptive premises in an argument often prove to be more problematic than universal ethical principles. Thus, non-ethical issues related to a general philosophical underpinning - e.g. epistemology, semantics, and ontology - are highly relevant for determining a justification strategy, especially when strong metaphysical assumptions are involved. Even if some values are shared with traditional biomedicine, axiological differences have to be considered as well. Further research should be done about specific CAM positions. These could be combined with applied qualitative social research methods.
|
 | Dieser Datensatz wurde nicht während einer Tätigkeit an der Universität Mannheim veröffentlicht, dies ist eine Externe Publikation. |
 Search Authors in
You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail
Actions (login required)
 |
Show item |
|
|
