Damage compensation claims in case of cartels are supposed to increase deterrence,
compensate losses and increase efficiency. I show that such claims can instead
have adverse effects: If suppliers or buyers of cartelists are compensated in proportion
to the profits lost due to the cartel, expected cartel profits can increase. Claims
of downstream firms against upstream cartelists who do not monopolize the market
increase consumer prices. Suppliers of cartelists can be worse off when eligible to
compensation. These results apply also to abuses of dominance and call for a more
careful approach towards the private enforcement of competition law.
Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.