Legislative governance in times of international terrorism


König, Thomas ; Finke, Daniel



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002713503298
URL: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00220...
Additional URL: http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/d7/de/publications...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2015
The title of a journal, publication series: Journal of Conflict Resolution
Volume: 59
Issue number: 2
Page range: 262-282
Place of publication: Thousand Oaks, CA
Publishing house: Sage Periodicals Press
ISSN: 0022-0027 ; 1552-8766
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
School of Social Sciences > Politische Wissenschaft II (König)
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: How do political parties with different policy-making interests and veto power respond to international terrorism—can coalition parties and bicameral legislatures overcome their policy-making tensions and form a unified front for adopting counterterrorist measures? This study examines German counterterrorist legislation before and after the attacks of 9/11 by using a dictionary-based computerized text analysis. Our findings demonstrate that in times of low threat, the level of intra-coalition and bicameral conflict decreases the likelihood of counterterrorist legislation. However, in the event of a high external threat, this effect disappears despite the continuing divergence in partisan policy preferences. This suggests that a high external threat imposes inaction costs on political parties, which they attempt to avoid by adopting counterterrorist measures in the legislative arena.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item