Legislative Responsiveness to Gerrymandering: Evidence from the 2003 Texas Redistricting

Lo, James

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00012073
URL: http://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/j...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2013
The title of a journal, publication series: Quarterly Journal of Political Science
Volume: 8
Issue number: 1
Page range: 75-92
Place of publication: Boston; Delft
Publishing house: Now Publishers
ISSN: 1554-0634
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > SFB 884
Subject: 320 Political science
Keywords (English): Gerrymandering , Redistricting
Abstract: Do legislators respond to congressional redistricting? A central tenet of American legislative scholarship over the last 20 years argues that members of Congress maintain consistent ideological positions throughout their tenure, and thus do not generally adapt their voting records to changes in the electoral environment. In contrast, a second literature argues that legislators are predominantly motivated by electoral incentives through an electoral connection, forcing them to adapt to the shifting environment as agents of the electorate. In this research note, I test these competing theories using data from the 2003 Texas redistricting. Despite being treated to a targeted gerrymander subjecting them to extreme electoral pressure, I find little evidence of ideological adaption in the voting records of eight Democrats that were targeted for defeat. My results thus confirm the earlier findings of Poole (2007) and have broader implications for the study of political representation and polarization.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Metadata export


+ Search Authors in

BASE: Lo, James

Google Scholar: Lo, James

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information

You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail

Actions (login required)

Show item Show item