Framing effects and comparative social policy reform : comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments

Wenzelburger, Georg ; Hörisch, Felix

Additional URL:
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2016
The title of a journal, publication series: Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis
Volume: 18
Issue number: 2
Page range: 157-175
Place of publication: Abingdon ; London
Publishing house: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 1387-6988 , 1572-5448
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: Following Paul Pierson’s work on the New Politics of the Welfare State, numerous studies on welfare state reforms have shown that governments enacting welfare cuts regularly employ blame avoidance strategies and use issue frames when they communicate welfare reform poli-cies. However, it remains largely unexplained to what extent these blame avoidance strategies really impact on the attitudes of voters on the micro level. This study sets out to fill this void in the literature. Using an experiment on pension reforms and student grant cutbacks, we pro-vide experimental evidence which shows that blame avoidance and framing strategies affect individual attitudes towards the proposed policies – in particular in case of pension reforms. Moreover, in case of the pension experiment, the impact is conditioned by individual risk ex-posure. These results add significantly to the literature on blame avoidance and welfare state reform policies by indicating that successful blame avoidance may be the reason why gov-ernments are not always punished for cutbacks to the welfare state.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Metadata export


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information

You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail

Actions (login required)

Show item Show item