Manifestos, salience and junior ministerial appointments


Greene, Zachary ; Jensen, Christian B.


DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068814549336
URL: http://ppq.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/09/08/13...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2016
The title of a journal, publication series: Party Politics
Volume: 22
Issue number: 3
Page range: 382-392
Place of publication: London [u.a.]
Publishing house: Sage Publ.
ISSN: 1354-0688 ; 1460-3683
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > SFB 884
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: We build on previous theories of junior minister allocation and coalition oversight by incorporating a novel theory of strategic changes in the issues covered in party manifestos. We argue that parties use junior ministerial appointments to oversee their coalition partners on portfolios that correspond to issues emphasized by the parties’ activists when the coalition partner’s preferences deviate from the party’s. The findings, based on a data set of more than 2800 party-portfolio dyads in 10 countries, show significant support for these expectations. We find that party leaders who successfully negotiate for junior ministers to particular portfolios are most concerned about checking ideologically contentious coalition partners in areas of concern to activists. The results also illustrate the usefulness of our dyadic approach for the study of junior minister allocation.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




+ Citation Example and Export

Greene, Zachary ; Jensen, Christian B. (2016) Manifestos, salience and junior ministerial appointments. Party Politics London [u.a.] 22 3 382-392 [Article]


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item