Evaluating active (opt-in) and passive (opt-out) consent bias in the transfer of federal contact data to a third-party survey agency


Sakshaug, Joseph W. ; Schmucker, Alexandra ; Kreuter, Frauke ; Couper, Mick P. ; Singer, Eleanor



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smw020
URL: http://jssam.oxfordjournals.org/content/4/3/382
Weitere URL: http://www.iab.de/389/section.aspx/Publikation/k16...
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Erscheinungsjahr: 2016
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe: Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology : JSSAM
Band/Volume: 4
Heft/Issue: 3
Seitenbereich: 382-416
Ort der Veröffentlichung: Oxford
Verlag: Oxford Univ. Press
ISSN: 2325-0984 , 2325-0992
Sprache der Veröffentlichung: Englisch
Einrichtung: Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften > Statistik u. Sozialwissenschaftliche Methodenlehre (Kreuter 2014-2020)
Fachgebiet: 310 Statistik
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): Data privacy , Informed Consent , nonresponse , Self-selection bias , Total survey error
Abstract: Obtaining informed consent from individuals to participate in voluntary research studies is widely considered to be an ethical research practice. However, there is considerable debate over how consent should be obtained from subjects. Many researchers argue that active (opt-in) consent is the only type of consent that accurately reflects the true wishes of the subject and is closer to the informed consent ideal than passive (opt-out) consent procedures. Opponents of active consent procedures argue that such procedures harm study participation rates and increase the risk of self-selection bias to a greater extent than passive consent procedures. Empirical evaluations of these claims are rare, given the lack of studies that experimentally assign subjects to different consent procedures and utilize a control group (in which no consent is sought) to facilitate comparison. We report on an experiment that overcomes these issues in an study of consent to transfer contact data from a federal register to a third-party data collector for purposes of carrying out a telephone survey. Specifically, we evaluate the impact of requiring consent on survey participation rates, self-selection bias, and the resulting survey estimates. We find that the passive consent procedure does a better job of minimizing self-selection bias and maximizing the validity of the survey estimates (relative to the control group) compared with the active consent procedure. However, neither procedure is ideal: Both consent procedures increase the total self-selection bias and reduce the sample size. We conclude with a general discussion of the main findings and their practical implications.




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadaten-Export


Zitation


+ Suche Autoren in

+ Aufruf-Statistik

Aufrufe im letzten Jahr

Detaillierte Angaben



Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Eintrag anzeigen Eintrag anzeigen