The impact of sound-bite journalism on public argument


Rinke, Eike Mark


DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12246
URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcom.12...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306004591...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2016
The title of a journal, publication series: Journal of Communication
Volume: 66
Issue number: 4
Page range: 625-645
Place of publication: Oxford ; Hoboken NJ
Publishing house: Blackwell ; Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 0021-9916 , 1460-2466
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: The rise of sound-bite news is one of the most widely bemoaned findings in political communication research. Yet, the detrimental effects of this trend have been more assumed than demonstrated. This study examines one consequence of sound-bite journalism: the creation of incomplete argument, in which speakers presenting their political position in the news do not also justify it. Drawing on data about television news in Germany, Russia, and the United States, it shows that shrinking sound bites consistently reduce the probability of opinion justification across widely differing national contexts. Sound-bite journalism emerges as harmful to television news' ability to produce public justification.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




+ Citation Example and Export

Rinke, Eike Mark (2016) The impact of sound-bite journalism on public argument. Journal of Communication Oxford ; Hoboken NJ 66 4 625-645 [Article]


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item