Holding individual representatives accountable : the role of electoral systems
Rudolph, Lukas
;
Däubler, Thomas
DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.1086/685378
|
URL:
|
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/68537...
|
Dokumenttyp:
|
Zeitschriftenartikel
|
Erscheinungsjahr:
|
2016
|
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe:
|
The Journal of Politics : JOP
|
Band/Volume:
|
78
|
Heft/Issue:
|
3
|
Seitenbereich:
|
746-762
|
Ort der Veröffentlichung:
|
Chicago, IL
|
Verlag:
|
University of Chicago Press
|
ISSN:
|
0022-3816 , 1468-2508
|
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:
|
Englisch
|
Einrichtung:
|
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > MZES - Arbeitsbereich B
|
Fachgebiet:
|
320 Politik
|
Abstract:
|
Voters are reluctant to sanction representatives for individual misconduct if they have to balance candidate-level and party-level factors in their choice, but this trade-off is affected by the electoral system. Our general theoretical model explains why individual accountability can empirically occur in single-member district (SMD) systems but is expected under less restrictive conditions using open-list proportional representation (OLPR). The latter not only decouples party and candidate choice but also makes seat allocation more vote elastic. For a thorough empirical test of our argument, we draw on real-world evidence from state-level elections in Bavaria, Germany, which are held under an unusual mixed-member system. Exploiting a recent public scandal involving one-third of representatives, we examine how electoral punishment of the same candidates by the same voters differs across electoral rules. Drawing on difference-in-differences as well as matching/regression estimators, we show that electoral punishment is substantially larger under OLPR than under SMD systems.
|
| Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie. |
Suche Autoren in
Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail
Actions (login required)
|
Eintrag anzeigen |
|
|