Which basic rules underlie social judgment? Agency follows a zero-sum principle and communion follows a non-zero-sum principle
Dufner, Michael
;
Leising, Daniel
;
Gebauer, Jochen E.
DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216640902
|
URL:
|
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167216...
|
Weitere URL:
|
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295854928...
|
Dokumenttyp:
|
Zeitschriftenartikel
|
Erscheinungsjahr:
|
2016
|
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe:
|
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin : PSPB
|
Band/Volume:
|
42
|
Heft/Issue:
|
5
|
Seitenbereich:
|
677-687
|
Ort der Veröffentlichung:
|
Thousand Oaks, Calif.
|
Verlag:
|
Sage Publ.
|
ISSN:
|
0146-1672 , 1552-7433
|
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:
|
Englisch
|
Einrichtung:
|
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > MZES - Arbeitsbereich A
|
Fachgebiet:
|
300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie, Anthropologie
|
Abstract:
|
How are people who generally see others positively evaluated themselves? We propose that the answer to this question crucially hinges on the content domain: We hypothesize that Agency follows a “zero-sum principle” and therefore people who see others as high in Agency are perceived as low in Agency themselves. In contrast, we hypothesize that Communion follows a “non-zero-sum principle” and therefore people who see others as high in Communion are perceived as high in Communion themselves. We tested these hypotheses in a round-robin and a half-block study. Perceiving others as agentic was indeed linked to being perceived as low in Agency. To the contrary, perceiving others as communal was linked to being perceived as high in Communion, but only when people directly interacted with each other. These results help to clarify the nature of Agency and Communion and offer explanations for divergent findings in the literature.
|
| Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie. |
Suche Autoren in
Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail
Actions (login required)
|
Eintrag anzeigen |
|
|