Recruitment strategies for a probability-based online panel: Effects of interview length, question sensitivity, incentives and interviewers

Schaurer, Ines

Preview

PDF
Dissertation_Schaurer-1.pdf - Published
Download (3MB)

URL:	https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/42976
URN:	urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-429762
Document Type:	Doctoral dissertation
Year of publication:	2017
Place of publication:	Mannheim
University:	Universität Mannheim
Evaluator:	Bosnjak, Michael
Date of oral examination:	29 September 2017
Publication language:	English
Institution:	Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Leibniz-Institut für Sozialwissenschaften (GESIS)
Subject:	300 Social sciences, sociology, anthropology
Classification:	THES_SOZ: Umfrageforschung, statistische Datenanalyse, Online-Befragung,
Subject headings (SWD):	Online-Befragung , Umfrageforschung , Experiment , Interviewer
Keywords (English):	Probability-based online panels , panel recruitment , survey experiment , interviewer effects
Abstract:	Probability-based online panels represent a comparably new and emerging form of data collection infrastructures. To date, there is little empirical evidence on online panel recruitment. This dissertation aims to fill the gap and contribute experimental evidence. The overall objective is to identify ways to optimize the telephone recruitment process of a probability-based online panel in Germany and derive practical recommendations. Referring to the Total Survey Error perspective (Groves & Lyberg, 2010) optimal is defined in the sense of maximizing the recruitment probability and online participation probability and minimizing the selection bias under given budget constraints. Based on the framework of survey participation (Groves & Couper, 1998), the four studies of this dissertation focus on several aspects of the recruitment process that researchers can decide upon and have control about. In three survey experiments, the effect of varying survey features on the success of the recruitment process is analyzed. The experimental factors are the length of the recruitment interview, the inclusion of a sensitive question, and incentives. In an additional analysis, the role of interviewers as an additional error source during the recruitment process is examined.