Not a new gold standard : even big data cannot predict the future


Jäger, Kai


DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913811.2016.1237704
URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311528559...
Additional URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0891381...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2016
The title of a journal, publication series: Critical Review
Volume: 28
Issue number: 3/4
Page range: 335-355
Place of publication: New York, NY [u.a.]
Publishing house: Columbia University Press ; Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0891-3811 ; 1933-8007
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: Many scholars believe that the proliferation of large-scale datasets will spur scientific advancement and help us to predict the future using sophisticated statistical techniques. Indeed, a team of researchers achieved astonishing success using the world’s largest event dataset, produced by the icews project, to predict complex social outcomes such as civil wars and irregular government turnovers. However, the secret of their success lay in transforming epistemically difficult questions into easy ones. Forecasting the onset of civil wars becomes an easy task if one relies on explanatory variables that measure how often newspapers report on tensions, fights, or killings. But news reports on prewar conflicts are just variations of the variable that researchers want to predict; the finding that more conflicts are likely to occur when journalists report about conflicts carries little scientific value. A similar success rate in “predicting” interstate wars can also be achieved by a simple Google News search for country names and conflict-related news shortly just before a conflict is coded as a war. Big data can help researchers to make predictions in simple situations, but there is no evidence that predictions will also succeed in uncertain environments with complex outcomes - such as those characteristic of politics.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




+ Citation Example and Export

Jäger, Kai (2016) Not a new gold standard : even big data cannot predict the future. Critical Review New York, NY [u.a.] 28 3/4 335-355 [Article]


+ Search Authors in

BASE: Jäger, Kai

Google Scholar: Jäger, Kai

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item