Strategic ambiguity of party positions in multi-party competition


Bräuninger, Thomas ; Giger, Nathalie



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.18
URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/political-...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301597526...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2018
The title of a journal, publication series: Political Science Research and Methods : PSRM
Volume: 6
Issue number: 3
Page range: 527-548
Place of publication: Cambridge
Publishing house: Cambridge Univ. Press
ISSN: 2049-8470 , 2049-8489
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
School of Social Sciences > Political Economy (Bräuninger)
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: Party competition is largely about making policy promises to voters. We argue that the clarity of the expressed policy position may be equally important. If blurred messages toward different audiences and therefore ambiguous positions can attract votes from different groups, parties have incentives to present ambiguous rather than clear-cut policy platforms. We present a formal model of multi-party competition with stochastic voting where party leaders make strategic choices on both the position and the level of ambiguity of their platforms. Leaders respond to the demands of two principals, the general public and party core constituencies. We derive two hypothesis on the location and ambiguity of party platforms and provide initial tests of these hypotheses in a comparative setting in 14 Western European democracies gathering data on voter and party left-right positions from Eurobarometer surveys and electoral manifestos. Ambiguity of party profiles is estimated using a variant of Wordscores on a newly established data set of electoral manifestos. We find that platforms become more ambiguous as the preferences of the two principals diverge. Our findings imply that ambiguity can be a winning strategy for parties, especially in settings with strong partisan lines.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




+ Citation Example and Export

Bräuninger, Thomas ; Giger, Nathalie (2018) Strategic ambiguity of party positions in multi-party competition. Political Science Research and Methods : PSRM Cambridge 6 3 527-548 [Article]


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item