|
Signal detection and threshold models of source memory
Schütz, Julia
;
Bröder, Arndt
|
DOI:
|
https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000097
|
|
URL:
|
https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1027/1618...
|
|
Weitere URL:
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21310688
|
|
Dokumenttyp:
|
Zeitschriftenartikel
|
|
Erscheinungsjahr:
|
2011
|
|
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe:
|
Experimental Psychology
|
|
Band/Volume:
|
58
|
|
Heft/Issue:
|
4
|
|
Seitenbereich:
|
293-311
|
|
Ort der Veröffentlichung:
|
Göttingen
|
|
Verlag:
|
Hogrefe
|
|
ISSN:
|
1618-3169 , 2190-5142
|
|
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:
|
Englisch
|
|
Einrichtung:
|
Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften > Allgemeine Psychologie (Bröder 2010-)
|
|
Fachgebiet:
|
150 Psychologie
|
|
Abstract:
|
Recently, several authors claimed that the curvilinear shape of rating-based source memory receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) refutes threshold models. However, rating-based ROCs are not diagnostic to disprove threshold models. Furthermore, source memory ROC-analyses ignore influences of other processes like old-new-detection and old-new-response-tendencies, so direct estimation of parameters is preferable. Five source monitoring experiments with different response bias manipulations and materials were conducted. We fitted the Two High Threshold Multinomial Model of Source Monitoring by Bayen, Murnane, and Erdfelder (1996) and the Multivariate Signal Detection Model for Selection by DeCarlo (2003). We also included rating-based ROCs. The results suggest that both models are at least equally valid as measurement tools which capture bias processes in the corresponding parameters, and they can perhaps be integrated theoretically.
|
 | Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie. |
 Suche Autoren in
Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail
Actions (login required)
 |
Eintrag anzeigen |
|
|
