Signal detection and threshold models of source memory


Schütz, Julia ; Bröder, Arndt



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000097
URL: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/full/10.1027/1618...
Additional URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21310688
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2011
The title of a journal, publication series: Experimental Psychology
Volume: 58
Issue number: 4
Page range: 293-311
Place of publication: Göttingen
Publishing house: Hogrefe
ISSN: 1618-3169 , 2190-5142
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Social Sciences > Allgemeine Psychologie (Bröder 2010-)
Subject: 150 Psychology
Abstract: Recently, several authors claimed that the curvilinear shape of rating-based source memory receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) refutes threshold models. However, rating-based ROCs are not diagnostic to disprove threshold models. Furthermore, source memory ROC-analyses ignore influences of other processes like old-new-detection and old-new-response-tendencies, so direct estimation of parameters is preferable. Five source monitoring experiments with different response bias manipulations and materials were conducted. We fitted the Two High Threshold Multinomial Model of Source Monitoring by Bayen, Murnane, and Erdfelder (1996) and the Multivariate Signal Detection Model for Selection by DeCarlo (2003). We also included rating-based ROCs. The results suggest that both models are at least equally valid as measurement tools which capture bias processes in the corresponding parameters, and they can perhaps be integrated theoretically.




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item