Equal performance of minority and majority coalitions? Pledge fulfilment in the German state of NRW


Matthieß, Theres



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2018.1528235
URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09644...
Additional URL: https://data.gesis.org/sharing/#!Detail/10.7802/1....
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2019
The title of a journal, publication series: German Politics
Volume: 28
Issue number: 1
Page range: 123-144
Place of publication: Philadelphia, PA
Publishing house: Routledge, Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0964-4008 , 1743-8993
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: This study examines how a government’s majority status affects coalition governance and performance. Two steps are investigated: the inclusion of government parties’ electoral pledges into the coalition agreement, and the ability to translate pledges into legislative outputs. The main results of a comparative analysis of 183 pledges of a minority (without a formal support partner) and majority coalition in the German State North Rhine-Westphalia indicate that government parties with minority status include fewer pledges in the coalition agreement. But this does not mean that they also perform badly at pledge fulfilment. In fact, they show an equivalent performance in fulfilling election pledges, at least partially, when compared to majority government parties. However, there is tentative evidence that the prime minister’s party shows a lower quality of pledge fulfilment, as measured by a higher share of partially enacted pledges.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item