Grand theories, differentiated integration


Schimmelfennig, Frank ; Winzen, Thomas



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761
URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13501...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330921353...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2019
The title of a journal, publication series: Journal of European Public Policy
Volume: 26
Issue number: 8
Page range: 1172-1192
Place of publication: Abingdon
Publishing house: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN: 1350-1763 , 1466-4429
Related URLs:
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Subject: 320 Political science
Abstract: Even though differentiation has become a core feature of the EU, the grand theories have focused almost exclusively on uniform integration. In this article, we derive hypotheses about differentiated integration from liberal intergovernmentalism, neofunctionalism, and postfunctionalism. In an analysis of EU treaty making between 1992 and 2016, we find evidence that heterogeneity of both wealth and identity, integration in the area of core state powers, and pre-existing differentiation drive differentiated integration. A comparison of the explanatory power of the grand theories shows that neo- and post-functionalism explain the differentiations that member states obtain in EU reform treaties more convincingly than liberal intergovernmentalism. A synthetic model performs best, however. The grand theories also leave noteworthy variation unexplained.

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item