|
A Novel Forwarding Paradigm for Position-Based Routing (with Implicit Addressing)
Füßler, Holger
;
Widmer, Jörg
;
Mauve, Martin
;
Hartenstein, Hannes
|
URL:
|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CCW.2003.1240810
|
|
Dokumenttyp:
|
Konferenzveröffentlichung
|
|
Erscheinungsjahr:
|
2003
|
|
Buchtitel:
|
Proceedings / CCW 2003, 2003 IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications : Dana Point, California, USA, 20 - 21 October 2003
|
|
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe:
|
Proceedings of IEEE 18th Annual Workshop on Computer Communications (CCW 2003), Technical Committee on Computer Communications (TCCC) of the IEEE Communications Society, Dana Point, CA, 20.10.2003
|
|
Seitenbereich:
|
194-200
|
|
Ort der Veröffentlichung:
|
Piscataway, NJ
|
|
Verlag:
|
IEEE Operations Center
|
|
ISBN:
|
0-7803-8239-0
|
|
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:
|
Englisch
|
|
Einrichtung:
|
Fakultät für Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsmathematik > Praktische Informatik IV (Effelsberg 1989-2017)
|
|
Fachgebiet:
|
004 Informatik
|
|
Abstract:
|
Existing position-based unicast routing algorithms which forward packets in the geographic direction of the destination require that the forwarding node knows the positions of all neighbors in its transmission range. This information on direct neighbors is gained by observing beacon messages each node sends out periodically. Due to mobility, the information that a node receives about its neighbors becomes outdated, leading either to a significant decrease in the packet delivery rate or to a steep increase in load on the wireless channel as node mobility increases. In this paper, we describe a mechanism to perform position-based unicast forwarding without the help of beacons. In our contention-based forwarding scheme (CBF), the next hop is selected through a distributed contention process based on the actual positions of all current neighbors. For the contention process, CBF makes use of biased timers. To avoid packet duplication, the first node that is selected suppresses the selection of further nodes. Since the basic scheme can lead to packet duplication, we describe alternative ways of suppressing those. In addition to that, we compare the CBF schemes and standard greedy forwarding by means of simulation with ns-2.
|
 | Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie. |
 Suche Autoren in
Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail
Actions (login required)
 |
Eintrag anzeigen |
|
|
