Does remote match reality? Comparing the effectiveness of a self-help app for panic disorder and agoraphobia to face-to-face CBT


Spies, Justine ; Lang, Thomas ; Gerlach, Alexander L. ; Kircher, Tilo ; Hamm, Alfons ; Alpers, Georg W. ; Fydrich, Thomas ; Arolt, Volker ; Deckert, Jürgen ; Ströhle, Andreas ; Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich ; Helbig-Lang, Sylvia


[img]
Vorschau
PDF
Psychol Psychother - 2025 - Spies - Does remote match reality Comparing the effectiveness of a self‐help app for panic.pdf - Veröffentlichte Version

Download (927kB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.70012
URL: https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10....
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-707982
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Erscheinungsjahr: 2026
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe: Psychology and Psychotherapy
Band/Volume: 99
Heft/Issue: 1
Seitenbereich: 129-148
Ort der Veröffentlichung: Oxford ; Hoboken, NJ
Verlag: Wiley
ISSN: 1476-0835 , 2044-8341
Sprache der Veröffentlichung: Englisch
Einrichtung: Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften > Klinische u. Biologische Psychologie u. Psychotherapie (Alpers 2010-)
Bereits vorhandene Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Fachgebiet: 150 Psychologie
Abstract: Background Exposure-based CBT is highly effective in treating patients with panic disorder and agoraphobia; however, access to such treatments is often limited. Smartphone-based self-management apps offer a promising low-threshold treatment alternative to face-to-face therapy. Although such health apps have shown to be effective in reducing anxiety symptoms, comparisons to active treatments are still scarce. Therefore, this study compared the effectiveness of a self-help app to an established face-to-face CBT intervention for panic and agoraphobia. Method The present study conducts a post hoc comparison of two independent RCTs examining participants with panic disorder and/or agoraphobia. Interventions in both studies were based on the same CBT manual. Study 1 (n = 138) included face-to-face CBT; Study 2 addressed the effects of a digital self-help intervention (n = 57). Main outcomes comprised symptoms of both panic disorder and agoraphobia, depressive symptoms and agoraphobic avoidance. Data were analysed using linear mixed models in intent-to-treat and completer data sets. Results Linear mixed models showed that face-to-face treatment was superior to app treatment in reducing panic and agoraphobic symptoms (R2 = 0.32), depressive symptoms (R2 = 0.24) and agoraphobic avoidance (R2 = 0.12 and 0.15). Dropout rates did not differ significantly, and both interventions demonstrated high levels of adherence. Discussion Although a smartphone-based CBT intervention was effective in reducing symptoms of panic and agoraphobia, its efficacy was significantly below the effects of the same intervention delivered in face-to-face format. Thus, digital interventions might be most suitable within a stepped-care approach or to bridge waiting times for psychotherapy.




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.




Metadaten-Export


Zitation


+ Suche Autoren in

+ Download-Statistik

Downloads im letzten Jahr

Detaillierte Angaben



Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Eintrag anzeigen Eintrag anzeigen