The appraisal model of conspiracy theories (AMCT) : applying appraisal theories to understand emotional and behavioral reactions to conspiracy theories


Pummerer, Lotte ; Gkinopoulos, Theofilos ; Douglas, Karen M. ; Jolley, Daniel ; Sassenberg, Kai


[img]
Preview
PDF
The Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories AMCT Applying Appraisal Theories to Understand Emotional and Behavioral Reactions to Conspiracy Theories.pdf - Published

Download (734kB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2024.2442906
URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10478...
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-713312
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2024
The title of a journal, publication series: Psychological Inquiry
Volume: 35
Issue number: 3-4
Page range: 159-178
Place of publication: Mahwah, NJ
Publishing house: Erlbaum
ISSN: 1047-840X , 1532-7965
Related URLs:
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Social Sciences > Sozialpsychologie und Mikrosoziologie (Stavrova 2025-)
Pre-existing license: Creative Commons Attribution, Non-Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Subject: 150 Psychology
300 Social sciences, sociology, anthropology
Keywords (English): anger , appraisal theory , conspiracy theories , disgust , emotion , fear , pride , schadenfreude
Abstract: Beliefs in conspiracy theories are related to a diverse set of emotional and behavioral consequences. At the same time, a theoretical model detailing when a conspiracy theory is more likely to elicit confrontation compared to withdrawal, indirect aggression or community-building is missing. We argue that appraisals provide the missing link between conspiracy beliefs and their consequences, proposing the Appraisal Model of Conspiracy Theories (AMCT). Based on appraisal theories of emotions, we outline how the focus on different features that vary between conspiracy theories and the situations in which they are embedded (i.e., focus on secrecy vs. gained knowledge; powerlessness vs. option of confrontation; harm to oneself vs. others) facilitate specific appraisals, resulting in different behavioral outcomes. We also outline how the AMCT helps to reconcile inconsistent research on conspiracy beliefs by providing better predictions about their emotional and behavioral consequences.




Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.

Dieser Datensatz wurde nicht während einer Tätigkeit an der Universität Mannheim veröffentlicht, dies ist eine Externe Publikation.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Download Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item