A Comparison of Steiner Tree Relaxations


Polzin, Tobias ; Vahdati Daneshmand, Siavash


[img]
Preview
PDF
1998_05.pdf - Published

Download (974kB)

URL: http://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/1747
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-17477
Document Type: Working paper
Year of publication: 1998
The title of a journal, publication series: None
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Business Informatics and Mathematics > Sonstige - Fakultät für Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wirtschaftsmathematik
MADOC publication series: Veröffentlichungen der Fakultät für Mathematik und Informatik > Institut für Informatik > Technical Reports
Subject: 004 Computer science, internet
Subject headings (SWD): Steiner-Problem , Relaxation , Untere Schranke
Keywords (English): Steiner problem , relaxation , lower bound
Abstract: There are many (mixed) integer programming formulations of the Steiner problem in networks. The corresponding linear programming relaxations are of great interest particularly, but not exclusively, for computing lower bounds; but not much has been known ab out the relative quality of these relaxations. We compare all classical and some new relaxations from a theoretical point of view with respect to their optimal values. Among other things, we prove that the optimal value of a flowclass relaxation (e.g. the multicommodity flow or the dicut relaxation) cannot be worse than the optimal value of a tree-class relaxation (e.g. degree-constrained spanning tree relaxation) and that the ratio of the corresponding optimal values can be arbitrarily large. Furthermore, we present a new flow based relaxation, which is to the authors' knowledge the strongest linear relaxation of polynomial size for the Steiner problem in networks.




Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Download Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item