Who wears the trousers? A semiparametric analysis of decision power in couples

Vorschau

PDF
meadp_168_08.pdf - Veröffentlichte Version
Download (1MB)

URL:	https://ub-madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/2080
URN:	urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-20809
Dokumenttyp:	Arbeitspapier
Erscheinungsjahr:	2008
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe:	MEA Discussion Papers
Band/Volume:	168
Ort der Veröffentlichung:	Mannheim
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:	Englisch
Einrichtung:	Fakultät für Rechtswissenschaft und Volkswirtschaftslehre > Sonstige - Fakultät für Rechtswissenschaft und Volkswirtschaftslehre
MADOC-Schriftenreihe:	Veröffentlichungen des MEA (Mannheim Research Institute For the Economics of Aging) > MEA Discussion Papers
Fachgebiet:	330 Wirtschaft
Fachklassifikation:	JEL: C14 J14 D13 ,
Normierte Schlagwörter (SWD):	Familie , Haushalt , Familienökonomie , Haushaltsökonomie
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch):	Family Economics , Intra-household bargaining , semiparametric methods , multiple index models
Abstract:	Decision processes among couples depend on the balance of power between the partners, determining the welfare of household members as well as household outcomes. However, little is known about the determinants of power. The collective model of household behavior gives an operational definition of decision power. We argue that important aspects of this concept of power are measurable through self-assessments of partners’ say. Using such a measure, we model balance of power as an outcome of the interplay between both partners’ demographic, socioeconomic, and health characteristics. Advancing flexible, yet parsimonious empirical models is crucial for the analysis, as both absolute status as well as relative position in the couple might potentially affect the balance of power, and gender-asymmetries may be important. Appropriately, we advance semiparametric double index models that feature one separate index for each spouse, which interact nonparametrically in the determination of power. Based on data from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), we find education and employment status to be associated with more individual decision power, especially for women. Moreover, health and income have independent effects on the distribution of power. We also show that contextual factors are important determinants of decision power, with women in urban couples featuring more decision power than their rural counterparts.