Knowledge boundaries in enterprise software platform development: Antecedents and consequences for platform governance


Förderer, Jens ; Kude, Thomas ; Schütz, Sebastian Walter ; Heinzl, Armin



DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12186
URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/i...
Additional URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322783898...
Document Type: Article
Year of publication: 2019
The title of a journal, publication series: Information Systems Journal : ISJ
Volume: 29
Issue number: 1
Page range: 119-144
Place of publication: Oxford [u.a.]
Publishing house: Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN: 1350-1917 , 1365-2575
Publication language: English
Institution: Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences - CDSB (Business Studies)
Business School > ABWL u. Wirtschaftsinformatik I (Heinzl 2002-)
Subject: 330 Economics
Keywords (English): case study , enterprise software , knowledge boundaries , knowledge boundary resources , platform ecosystems , platform governance
Abstract: The widespread uptake of platform strategies turns many vendors of enterprise software into curators of an ecosystem of firms that collaboratively develop and commercialize a shared technology. As a platform owner's effectiveness in integrating knowledge across ecosystem participants will distinguish it from its competitors, we investigate the management of development-related knowledge across firm boundaries. Our exploratory, multiple-case study of 4 platforms illustrates how “knowledge boundaries” emerge between platform owners and complementors. We observe that knowledge boundaries are influenced by a platform's functional extent, interface design, and evolutionary dynamics, which create differences, dependencies, and novelty of development knowledge, resulting in qualitatively distinct types of knowledge boundaries. To overcome knowledge boundaries, platform owners provide various resources at the boundary, including information portals, documentation, helpdesks, and alignment workshops. We observe that in shaping these resources, platform owners face a trade-off between providing knowledge at the right scope, while allowing for the scalability of knowledge resources for the entire ecosystem. Depending on their scope and scale, we classify knowledge boundary resources as broadcasting, brokering, and bridging, each representing qualitatively distinct patterns in managing knowledge in platform ecosystems. We conclude with implications for researchers and managers.




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Page Views

Hits per month over past year

Detailed information



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item