Social projection vs. self-stereotyping : the role of socio-cognitive mindsets in the activation of cognitive inferential processes

Thurner, Florian

Vorschau

PDF
Dissertation_Thurner.pdf - Veröffentlichte Version
Download (2MB)

URL:	https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/46239
URN:	urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-462393
Dokumenttyp:	Dissertation
Erscheinungsjahr:	2018
Ort der Veröffentlichung:	Mannheim
Hochschule:	Universität Mannheim
Gutachter:	Meiser, Thorsten
Datum der mündl. Prüfung:	5 September 2018
Sprache der Veröffentlichung:	Englisch
Einrichtung:	Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaften > Psychologische Methodenlehre u. Diagnostik (Meiser 2009-)
Fachgebiet:	150 Psychologie
Normierte Schlagwörter (SWD):	Psychologie , Dissertation , Sozialpsychologie , Stereotyp , Priming
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch):	social cognition , self-construal , situated cognition , social projection , self-stereotyping
Abstract:	In which way does the priming of socio-cognitive mindsets influence the predominance of cognitive inferential processes? Incorporating research on social-status differences on the one hand and on cross-cultural differences on the other hand, this dissertation takes a new perspective on the directionality issue of cognitive inferential processes. Based on previous research in these areas, it is assumed that the currently active mode of self-construal constitutes a fundamental factor which influences the construction of personal experience and behavior and which determines the direction of cognitive inferential processes: Socio-cognitive mindsets are proposed to account for a basic factor which influences the individual’s way of construing his or her world. It was hypothesized that an independent mindset with its distinctive focus on the individual would cause a person to interpret his or her world from the individual’s point of view (social projection). On the other hand, it was suggested that an interdependent mindset with its more pronounced focus on social context and on other persons would trigger the reversed process (self-stereotyping). After these initial hypotheses could not be confirmed in the course of three experiments, an alternative hypothesis was suggested in an attempt to explain the contrary but largely consistent results. In the second part of this thesis, implications of Optimal Distinctiveness Theory (Brewer, 1991) were taken into account. A person’s individually preferred level of distinctiveness was suggested to depend on the currently active socio-cognitive mindset. As a post-hoc explanation, it was proposed that, via the employed priming methods, reactant responses may inadvertently have been triggered: participants’ preferred equilibrium may have been shifted undesirably along the dimension personal vs. social identity. As a result, participants may have engaged in corresponding compensating counter-reactions. A final experiment was conducted in an attempt to replicate previously obtained paradox effects and to make them directly visible.