The integrative complexity of online user comments across different types of democracy and discussion arenas


Jakob, Julia ; Dobbrick, Timo ; Wessler, Hartmut


[img] PDF
jakob-et-al-2021-the-integrative-complexity-of-online-user-comments-across-different-types-of-democracy-and-discussion.pdf - Veröffentlichte Version

Download (631kB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211044018
URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/60733
Weitere URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/hijb/0/0
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-607338
Dokumenttyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
Erscheinungsjahr: 2023
Titel einer Zeitschrift oder einer Reihe: The International Journal of Press/Politics : IJPP
Band/Volume: 28
Heft/Issue: 3
Seitenbereich: 580-600
Ort der Veröffentlichung: Thousand Oaks, CA
Verlag: Sage
ISSN: 1940-1612 , 1940-1620
Sprache der Veröffentlichung: Englisch
Einrichtung: Philosophische Fakultät > Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaft (Wessler 2007-)
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > MZES - Arbeitsbereich B
Bereits vorhandene Lizenz: Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Fachgebiet: 070 Nachrichtenmedien, Journalismus, Verlagswesen
Freie Schlagwörter (Englisch): online discussion , user comment , integrative complexity , justification , cross-national analysis , political system , socio-technical affordances
Abstract: This study is the first to compare the integrative complexity of online user comments across distinct democratic political systems and in discussion arenas with different primary use functions. Integrative complexity is a psycho-linguistic construct that is increasingly used by communication scholars to study the argumentative quality of political debate contributions. It captures the sophistication of online user comments in terms of differentiation and integration, mapping whether a post contains different aspects or viewpoints related to an issue and the extent to which it draws conceptual connections between these. This study investigates user contributions on the public role of religion and secularism in society between August 2015 and July 2016 from Australia, the United States, Germany, and Switzerland. In each country, it analyzes user posts from the (a) website comment sections and (b) public Facebook pages of mainstream news media, from the (c) Facebook pages of partisan collective actors and alternative media, and from (d) Twitter. Almost as many user contributions implicitly or explicitly differentiate various dimensions of or perspectives on an issue as express unidimensional, simplistic thoughts. Conceptual integration, however, is rare. The integrative complexity of online user comments is higher in consensus-oriented than in majoritarian democracies and in arenas that are used primarily for issue-driven, plural discussions rather than preference-driven, like-minded debates. This suggests that the accommodative public debate cultures of consensus-oriented political systems and interactions with individuals who hold different positions promote more argumentatively complex over simple online debate contributions.
Zusätzliche Informationen: Online-Ressource




Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.




Metadaten-Export


Zitation


+ Suche Autoren in

+ Download-Statistik

Downloads im letzten Jahr

Detaillierte Angaben



Sie haben einen Fehler gefunden? Teilen Sie uns Ihren Korrekturwunsch bitte hier mit: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Eintrag anzeigen Eintrag anzeigen