The integrative complexity of online user comments across different types of democracy and discussion arenas


Jakob, Julia ; Dobbrick, Timo ; Wessler, Hartmut


[img] PDF
19401612211044018.pdf - Published

Download (935kB)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211044018
URL: https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/60733
Additional URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/toc/hijb/0/0
URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:180-madoc-607338
Document Type: Article
Year of publication Online: 2021
The title of a journal, publication series: The International Journal of Press/Politics : IJPP
Volume: tba
Issue number: tba
Page range: tba
Place of publication: Thousand Oaks, CA
Publishing house: Sage
ISSN: 1940-1612 , 1940-1620
Publication language: English
Institution: School of Humanities > Medien I (Wessler)
Außerfakultäre Einrichtungen > Mannheim Centre for European Social Research - Research Department B
Pre-existing license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Subject: 070 News media, journalism, publishing
Keywords (English): online discussion , user comment , integrative complexity , justification , cross-national analysis , political system , socio-technical affordances
Abstract: This study is the first to compare the integrative complexity of online user comments across distinct democratic political systems and in discussion arenas with different primary use functions. Integrative complexity is a psycho-linguistic construct that is increasingly used by communication scholars to study the argumentative quality of political debate contributions. It captures the sophistication of online user comments in terms of differentiation and integration, mapping whether a post contains different aspects or viewpoints related to an issue and the extent to which it draws conceptual connections between these. This study investigates user contributions on the public role of religion and secularism in society between August 2015 and July 2016 from Australia, the United States, Germany, and Switzerland. In each country, it analyzes user posts from the (a) website comment sections and (b) public Facebook pages of mainstream news media, from the (c) Facebook pages of partisan collective actors and alternative media, and from (d) Twitter. Almost as many user contributions implicitly or explicitly differentiate various dimensions of or perspectives on an issue as express unidimensional, simplistic thoughts. Conceptual integration, however, is rare. The integrative complexity of online user comments is higher in consensus-oriented than in majoritarian democracies and in arenas that are used primarily for issue-driven, plural discussions rather than preference-driven, like-minded debates. This suggests that the accommodative public debate cultures of consensus-oriented political systems and interactions with individuals who hold different positions promote more argumentatively complex over simple online debate contributions.
Additional information: Online-Ressource

Dieser Eintrag ist Teil der Universitätsbibliographie.

Das Dokument wird vom Publikationsserver der Universitätsbibliothek Mannheim bereitgestellt.

Diese Publikation ist bisher nur Online erschienen. Diese Publikation nun als "Jetzt in Print erschienen" melden.




Metadata export


Citation


+ Search Authors in

+ Download Statistics

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics



You have found an error? Please let us know about your desired correction here: E-Mail


Actions (login required)

Show item Show item